Home/Blog/Monoperc vs Topcon vs HJt
    Monoperc vs Topcon vs HJt

    Monoperc vs Topcon vs HJt

    Arpit Solar
    18 February 2026
    2 min read
    TL;DR

    Here’s a simple but complete comparison of Mono PERC vs TOPCon vs HJT β€” the 3 main solar technologies used today. 🌞 1. Mono PERC (Older but still common)...

    Here’s a simple but complete comparison of Mono PERC vs TOPCon vs HJT β€” the 3 main solar technologies used today.

    🌞 1. Mono PERC (Older but still common)

    Full form: Passivated Emitter Rear Cell

    Type: Mostly P-type silicon

    βœ… Pros

    1. Cheapest technology
    2. Proven & widely available
    3. Good performance for budget projects

    ❌ Cons

    1. Lower efficiency compared to new tech
    2. Higher degradation
    3. More power loss in heat

    πŸ“Š Typical Performance

    1. Efficiency: 19–22%
    2. Lifespan: 25–30 years
    3. Degradation: Higher than N-type panels

    Mono PERC adds a reflective layer at the back of the cell to reuse sunlight and improve output compared to old mono panels.

    πŸ‘‰ Best for: Low budget residential projects

    ⚑ 2. TOPCon (Most Popular in 2024–2026 Market)

    Full form: Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact

    Type: N-type silicon (advanced)

    TOPCon is basically an improved version of PERC with an extra tunnel oxide layer that reduces energy loss and increases efficiency.

    βœ… Pros

    1. Higher efficiency than PERC
    2. Better heat performance
    3. Lower degradation
    4. Good price vs performance balance
    5. Becoming industry standard

    ❌ Cons

    1. Slightly costlier than PERC

    πŸ“Š Typical Performance

    1. Efficiency: 22–24% (or more)
    2. Lifespan: 25–30 years
    3. Better temperature tolerance

    Mass-production efficiency of TOPCon cells has already exceeded 25% in some cases.

    πŸ‘‰ Best for: Residential + commercial (most recommended today)

    πŸš€ 3. HJT (Most Advanced / Premium)

    Full form: Heterojunction Technology

    Type: Hybrid crystalline + thin-film silicon

    HJT combines crystalline silicon with thin-film layers to achieve very high efficiency and low losses.

    βœ… Pros

    1. Highest efficiency
    2. Best performance in heat & low light
    3. Very low degradation
    4. Highest bifacial gain
    5. Longer lifespan

    ❌ Cons

    1. Most expensive
    2. Limited manufacturers (still growing)

    πŸ“Š Typical Performance

    1. Efficiency: 24–26%+
    2. Lifespan: 30+ years
    3. Lowest temperature loss

    HJT panels degrade slower and maintain better output over lifetime compared to PERC.

    πŸ‘‰ Best for: Premium customers / large projects / space-limited roofs

    πŸ“Š Quick Comparison Table

    FeatureMono PERCTOPConHJT
    Efficiency⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
    Cost⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (cheapest)⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (costly)
    Technology LevelOldNew GenLatest
    DegradationHigherLowVery Low
    Heat PerformanceAverageGoodExcellent
    Bifacial GainLowHighVery High
    Market TrendDecliningπŸ”₯ Fast GrowingPremium Niche

    🧠 Which One is Best?

    βœ” Budget customer β†’ Mono PERC

    βœ” Most customers today β†’ TOPCon (Best choice)

    βœ” Premium / future-proof β†’ HJT

    Industry experts expect TOPCon to dominate the market in the next few years, while HJT grows gradually as costs fall.

    ⭐ Simple Real-World Advice (India Market)

    For rooftop solar sales:

    1. 5–10 kW residential β†’ TOPCon
    2. Commercial / industrial β†’ TOPCon or HJT
    3. Subsidy / low budget β†’ Mono PERC


    Ready to Go Solar?

    Get a free consultation and customized quote for your rooftop solar installation. Save up to 90% on your electricity bills!